Re: Silveira DENIED Certiorari

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:06:31 -0800, "Mike Haas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>The United States Supreme Court announced this morning that it has DENIED
>the Silveira vs. Lockyer Petition for Certiorari. The Supreme Court will not
>hear the case.
>
>We should all be thankful for this. For reasons set out by long-respected
>RKBA scholars, this case was disaster, now narrowly avoided for the most
>part. See http://www.calgunlaws.com/ and http://NRAMembersCouncils.com/ for
>articles.
>
>RKBA legal experts strongly suggest that those wishing to support getting a
>Second Amendment case before the Supreme Court send their money to support a
>case that does NOT arise in the hostile Ninth Circuit or California.  Note
>that there are two Second Amendment cases being litigated in the District of
>Columbia now, one by the NRA and one by CATO Institute.
>
>Mike Haas
>

And just what's the perfect case, Mikey?  Where do you draw the line
and go with what you've got.  


******************************************************

"The National Rifle Association has been in support of
 workable, enforceable gun control legislation since its
 very inception in 1871."

    NRA Executive Vice President Franklin L. Orth
    NRA's American Rifleman Magazine, March 1968, P. 22