Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Bill Bonde caught lying YET AGAIN!! Re: Attacks Are Becoming "Increasingly Insignificant"--US Military Spokesman




Frank Booth wrote:
> 
> "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > Frank Booth wrote:
> > >
> > > "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Adam Albright wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:22:51 -0800, "Bill Bonde ( the oblique
> allusion
> > > > > in lieu of the frontal attack )"  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Frank Booth wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal
> attack )"
> > > > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Frank Booth wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal
> > > attack )"
> > > > > >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > >> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > translation: " i have been caught out telling lies, so
> i'll
> > > evade
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > point"
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > game over, i win.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Can you at least explain what the lie was supposed to be?
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > gee bill, does it hurts being as stupid as you are?
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > of course the great lie is the reason given  for the illegal
> > > invasion of
> > > > > >> > > iraq, ie. that saddam posessed WMD and that they posed an
> > > imminent
> > > > > >> threat
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > What lie did I supposedly tell? That's the question I asked.
> Didn't
> > > you
> > > > > >> > put that in the subject line? What lie did I tell?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> look bill, calm down stop getting your nickers in a twist.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> if you read up the thread, you'll see that that i was referring t
> o
> > > another
> > > > > >> poster lying about the reasons used to invade iraq.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> as for the title, it was an older one that somehow got revisited,
> but
> > > > > >> clearly you *do* lie and you *are* a hypocrite in regards the
> reasons
> > > that
> > > > > >> the US invaded iraq.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> so yeah, you are a liar.:)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >So tell me where I lied? You can't because I haven't lied.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could be you're actually so stupid you don't know the difference
> > > > > between when you're lying and telling the truth.
> > > > >
> > > > I haven't been lying at all. I'm stating my views truthfully.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Or just maybe you're
> > > > > one of the legions of mindless dittoheads that eagerly accepts lies
> as
> > > > > "truth" and blindly goes along with any double talk, bullshit and
> > > > > fary-tales servered up daily by Bush, Powell, Limbaugh, el al. You
> > > > > think? I think so. ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > "Dittoheads" is a term for folks who listen to Rush Limbaugh. I do not
> > > > listen to Rush Limbaugh. I'm not sure what lies you are claiming Bush
> > > > and Powell are supposedly telling.
> > >
> > > now *that* is another whopping lie.
> > >
> > ???
> > > of course you realise that the issue with bush and powell was that they
> made
> > > the case for war in iraq based on a lie(read: imminent threat, tonnes of
> > > WMD, nukes etc etc )
> > >
> > They did not.
> 
> liar.
> 
Provide a complete and URL backed quote and we can discuss it.



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.