
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Stuart Grey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > fãhç wrote: > > > "Stuart Grey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >><Paranoid communist conspiracy theories snipped> > > Look! > > The commiecrat snipped all the stuff that PROVED he > was bullshitting! That's the pot calling the kettle black. You were the one that started clipping everything out of my replies and not responding to anything I said. Look! Old man Stewie dishes it out, but doesn't complains when it's done to him.... http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=i3wyb.368905%24HS4.3078395%40attbi_s01 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=I%25eyb.362503%24Tr4.1074645%40attbi_s03 > Again, > http://www.dea-ccat.dk/sun/JASTP2.htm >From your own cite... "In an earlier paper we have demonstrated that for data covering the period 1860-1980 the solar hypothesis does not rule out any significant contribution from man-made greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols. The present analysis goes a step further. We analyse the period 1579-1987 and find that the solar hypothesis - instead of contradicting - appears to support the assumption of a significant warming due to human activities. In an earlier paper we have demonstrated that for data covering the period 1860-1980 the solar hypothesis does not rule out any significant contribution from man-made greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols. The present analysis goes a step further. We analyse the period 1579-1987 and find that the solar hypothesis - instead of contradicting - appears to support the assumption of a significant warming due to human activities. " "Therefore our findings support a total reversal of the common assumption that a verification of the solar hypothesis would challenge the IPCC assessment of man-made global warming." Thanks for that link. But it contradicts everything you've been claiming. Looks like you are the one spreading "communist lies" on usenet now!
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |