
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > "Buckaroo Banzai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Steve, you can try and warp the meaning of those twenty-seven words in any > > manner you like, but their meaning is quite clear to any clear-thinking > > person. The Goverment *cannot* infringe on the individual's right to keep > > and bear arms. > > As long as they are part of a well regulated militia, you are right. > Otherwise, it can, has, and continues to "infringe" on individuals right to > keep and bear arms. > > Look at the court cases. You're wrong. Fuck the puppet filled courts. This should be easy for you to answer: Forget that the 2ndA even exists, *A well read electorate being necessary to secure proper public servants, the right of hte people to keep and read books, shall not be infringed* Does this mean that only the well read electorate can read books? How about this one: *A well-fed militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to own and work fields, shall not be infringed* Does this mean that only the militia can work the fields? Need some more? I have many. Fuck the courts and the horses they rode in on....and I don't like their hats. ta tah...
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |