Re: The 2ed Amendment as a Gun Nuts Wet Dream

The Lone Weasel wrote:

<snip>

> >> Irrelevant. Where is the term "bear arms" found above, or
> >> that it is a fundamental absolute right? You just make
> >> assertions and draw fantasy conclusions. The courts
> >> consistently kick your butt on this:
> >
> > How so.  Does a man have the fundamental right to dissolve
> > his government?  If yes, then he must have the right to
> > keep and bear arms if he feels the need to exercise that
> > right, such as it was exercised on April 19, 1775.
> 
> In the US we dissolve governments by voting for somebody
> else.  We can also amend the US Constitution, even replacing
> the entire thing if 3/4 of the state legislatures support it.
> 
> You might as well have the patience for that kind of
> dissolution, Linthead.  Your gunlobby hasn't forced but one
> Federal Circuit Court to accept its disinformation, and that
> was just some dicta by one judge supported by a second judge
> with the third judge chastising both of them; Judge Parker
> was joined by other Circuit judges, while no other Circuit
> judge has used Garwood's dicta as the basis of a legally
> binding decision.

Do you repudiate the actions of April 19, 1775, yes or no?

David