
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Foxtrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Jas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Clinton raised taxes a bit in the 90s with a resulting boom (albeit one with > >a false bubble). > > WHAT?? Raising taxes leads to economic booms?? So if > we raised taxes to 100%, we'd all be wildly prosperous, right? Yeah, right wingers claimed Clinton's raising taxes on the wealthy would bring a recession; the opposite happened, of course. > >Also, remember: > >There are more Americans living in poverty now than there were in 1965. Over > >thirteen million of them are children. (The US has the worst child poverty > >rate of all the world's industrialized countries.) Last year alone, another > >1.7 million Americans slipped below the poverty line, bringing the total to > >34.6 million, one in eight of the population, and up from 31.6 million in > >2000. (See "Economic Fault Lines in America's States," AFL-CIO report). > > Since we're worse off than we were before, will you liberals > admit that the trillions of dollars we spend on handouts for > the poor are a waste of money? And you're calling other people "stupid"? Do your parents know you're using their computer? Craig
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |