Re: Evidence Mounts That U.S. Military is LYING About "Victory At Samarra"

"Seawolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> " fãhç" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >
> > The Iraq soldiers killing babies in Kuwait story came from a girl who
> > was
> > letter found to be the daughter of an ambassador that was close to Bush
> > I and had been put up to lying under oath.  It wasn't found out until
> > after
> > Bush I moved into Kuwait that the story was bullshit manufactured to
> > help Bush push his case for war.
>
> Yeah.  And the fact that Iraq invaded Kuwait without reason didn't matter
> at all.............

Without reason?  You reveal your ignorance.  Go research the reasons why
Iraq invaded Kuwait.  If you do, also note that Saddam asked the United
States if it was okay with the US to invaded Kuwait.  The official response
from George Bush was, "We have no opinion on that."  By not waving the red
flag for Saddam, George Bush effectively gave Saddam the go-ahead for his
invasion.

> >
> > Then Bush I lied and said that 250,000 Iraqi troops and 1,500 tanks
> > stood on
> > the border, threatening the key US oil supplier.  But when the St.
> > Petersburg Times in Florida acquired two commercial Soviet satellite
> > images
> > of the same area, taken at the same time, no Iraqi troops were visible
> > near the Saudi border - just empty desert.
>
> That's because the were already in Kuwait idiot.............

No dumbass, GHW Bush claimed all those forces stood on the border of Saudi
Arabia getting ready to invade Saudi Arabia.  There were none there.  He
only said that to gain support for attacking Iraq by claiming that Saddam
wasn't going to satisfied with just invading Kuwait.

> >
> > Like father, like son.
> >
> > Now don't tell us you haven't heard about all the documented lies and
> > deceptions Dubyah and his administration have made in the lead up to his
> > invasion of Iraq.  Even if you are a Bush apologist, you must have at
> > least
> > heard about the lies.  You don't claim total ignorance do you?
> >
> > Here's just a starter list for you....
> >
> > 1. Powell relies on FORGED documents to link Saddam to terror.
>
> Cite?

The cites are below the quotes dummy.

>
> >
> > MSNBC: "They have been the closest of allies. But under the intense
> > pressure
> > of a diplomatic crisis at the United Nations and an imminent war in
> > Iraq,
> > the friendship between the United States and Britain is beginning to
> > fray.
>
> Oh yeah, that's why the Brit's when into Iraq with us.........
>
> > The most recent strain emerged when U.N. nuclear inspectors concluded
> > last
> > week that U.S. and British claims about Iraq's secret nuclear program
> > were
> > based on forged documents. The fake letters supposedly laid out how
> > Iraqi
> > agents had tried to purchase uranium from officials in Niger, central
> > Africa."
>
> No, the documents never said that Niger was the country of origin, just
> that
> Saddam had tried to get Uranium from Africa.  Funny, the Brits still stand
> by their intelligence on this matter, not that I would expect you to know
> that since Dan Rather hasn't bothered to include that tidbit on his
> nightly
> propaganda show...........
>

Yeah, that is funny, since the rest of the world knows the story is
bullshit.  So your an apologist for the Brits now too.  Gee, if the
documents *never* said anything about Niger, then why is that what everyone
is talking about?  Get real you dope.  When the Niger-Uranium sale documents
were proven to be forgeries, why would you believe the people using those
forged documents if they came back and said, "Well, maybe it wasn't Niger,
but it was someone, somewhere, we just can't tell you who."  Yeah, that
really inspires confidence in their intelligence service.

> >
> > MORE: http://www.msnbc.com/news/883164.asp?cp1=1
> >
> > CNN: WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Intelligence documents that U.S. and British
> > governments said were strong evidence that Iraq was developing nuclear
> > weapons have been dismissed as forgeries by U.N. weapons inspectors.
>
> Funny, the inspectors that have entered Iraq since the war have found
> documents showing that Iraq was actively pursuing an nuclear weapons
> program.........

Cite?  Dubyah's personal WMD searcher came out with a report saying he and
his thousands of inspectors with millions of dollars in funding, and months
of unrestricted access to the whole country, could not find any evidence of
any WMD or nuclear programs that exist now, or existed in the months leading
up to the war.

We were having lots of fun in these newsgroups a while ago when you
ditto-head would post some FauxNews or NewsMax story about WMD being found
and within 24 hours those stories all got pulled when it was found that
someone just hyped a finding that later turned out to be a false positive.

You've got to stop believing those stories having they've been proven wrong.
Get current on  your info.

You'll notice that there haven't been any news stories in a couple of months
now about WMD being found in Iraq.  That's because has been concluded by US
inspectors that there are none.  Dubyah's original reason for going to war
has vaporized.  Now he's a history revisionist, claiming other reasons for
going to war.  Listen to recorded speeches by him though to prove his
revisionism is bullshit...

http://www.angelfire.com/creep/gwbush/remindus.html