
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:53:13 -0500, Julian D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 15:11:16 GMT, "Winston Smith, American Patriot"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Logic-Defying "Fact" #1: U.S. suffers not one death, but kills 54 Iraqis
>>("Saddam fedayeen") who have some or even extensive military training.....?
>>And it takes fewer Iraqis to kill 2-3 U.S. troops in other "ambushes."
>>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>We heard you dopes crying about 'Jenin' as well.
>
Does it make you proud to defend murderers? I know it does. Dead
children are just icing on the cake for you, aren't they Julian?
>>Iraqis dispute Samarra battle casualties
>>Monday December 1, 2003
>>
>>The aftermath of the weekend battle in Samarra, which the US has claimed
>>was the deadliest since the war ended, today appeared murkier than first
>>reports suggested, as residents of the central Iraqi city accused
>>Washington of exaggerating its death toll.
>>
>>Initial US statements put the number of Iraqi dead at 46, with five
>>American soldiers injured, but the US today put its figure up to 54 Iraqi
>>fatalities.
>>
>>It also said that many of the dead Iraqis were wearing the uniform of the
>>Fedayeen, the militia most closely associated with Saddam Hussein and most
>>loyal to him
>>
>>But the Associated Press reported that some in Samarra believed fatalities
>>were much lower than the US's figures and that most of the dead were armed
>>civilians.
>>
>>It quoted one of the city residents claiming that civilians had grabbed
>>their guns when the US soldiers fired on insurgents who had attempted to
>>ambush their convoy.
>>
>>"Civilians shot back at the Americans," said 30-year-old Ali Hassan, who
>>was wounded by shrapnel in the battle. "They claim we are terrorists. So
>>OK, we are terrorists."
>>
>>The battle, fought by the US with tanks and machine gun-equipped Bradley
>>fighting vehicles, followed simultaneous ambushes on a US convoy travelling
>>through Samarra on the main road from Baghdad to Tikrit.
>>
>>Lieutentant Colonel William MacDonald of the 4th Infantry Division said the
>>response had sent a "clear message" that US would use its firepower to stop
>>such attacks.
>>
>>The US has been stepping up the scale of its response to the insurgents in
>>recent weeks.
>>
>>The scale of the attack and its apparent coordination has, however, shown
>>that rebels retain the ability to conduct synchronised operations despite
>>the offensive.
>>
>>At least 104 coalition troops, including 79 from the US, have died in Iraq
>>in November, the deadliest month since the war ended.
>>
>>Samarra is within the so-called Sunni triangle north of Baghdad, the
>>heartland of Saddam Hussein loyalists.
>>
>>The scars of the battle were today evident in Samarra. About a dozen cars
>>lay destroyed in the streets, many apparently crushed by tanks, and
>>buildings were strewn with bullet holes.
>>
>>Six destroyed vehicles sat in front of the hospital, where witnesses said
>>US tanks shelled people dropping off the injured. A kindergarten was
>>damaged, apparently by tank shells. No children were hurt.
>>
>>"Luckily we evacuated the children five minutes before we came under
>>attack," said Ibrahim Jassim, a 40-year-old guard at the kindergarten. "Why
>>did they attack randomly? Why did they shoot a kindergarten with tank
>>shells?"
>>
>>The weekend also saw seven Spanish intelligence agents, two Japanese
>>diplomats, a Colombian oil worker and two South Korean engineers killed in
>>Iraq.
>>
>>US officials said insurgents were targeting citizens of nations that
>>support the occupation of Iraq in an effort to undermine public support for
>>the operation.
>>
>>Both Tokyo and Seoul said that the attacks would not deter them from
>>sending troops to Iraq.
>>
>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1097338,00.html
>
>
>JD
>
>
>
>
>
>"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence
>reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his
>chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile
>delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
>given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists,
>including Al Qaeda members..."
>---- Hillary Clinton, Oct 10, 2002
>
>"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have
>terrorists and
>tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?
>If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and
>all recriminations
>would come too late."
> -President George W. Bush
> January 28, 2003
> (Another liberal lie exposed.)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |