
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Whatever; I'm not not slow in criticizing Islam when there are justified and non-hypocritical criticisms to be made, but on this issue Western countries don't necessarily have a record to be all that proud of -- when you look at the historical record, it was not so very long ago (the late 19th century) that men in English-speaking countries had an almost unquestioned right to use "moderate physical chastisement" on their wives according to the traditional rules of Common law; one court in the nineteenth-century U.S. ruled that: "the law permits (a man) to use towards his wife such a degree of force, as is necessary to control an unruly temper, and make her behave herself; and unless some permanent injury be inflicted, or there be an excess of violence, or such a degree of cruelty as shows that it is inflicted to gratify his own bad passions, the law will not invade the domestic forum, or go behind the curtain." -- SAUDIA OMNIS IN PARTES TRES DIVIDENDA EST! Free Arabia by splitting the Saudi tyranny into its three natural parts: Hejaz-alHarameyn, Nejd-Wahhabistan, and Gulf-Petrolia. Murderers are not Martyrs! http://symbolictruth.fateback.com/
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |