Re: Those Nice, Nuke-Pursuing Iranians

"Aussie Infidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "dapra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > Ed wrote:
> >
> > > "Margie K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >>How come the leftists don't care about Iranian or North Korean Nukes? I
> > >>thought nuclear weapons were bad?
> > >
> > >
> > > No, Margie, apparently ONLY the Israeli nuclear weapons are bad.
> > >
> >
> > According to best estimates, Israel has 200, Iran has none, North Korea
> > has 0-8 nukes.
> > One can understand why a nation, what is on Bush's hit list of the "axis
> > of evil", wants to have a few nukes to deter Bushs aggression. He
> > already took out one, under trumped up charges and false pretenses. And
> > of course the neocons are eager to extend the list in the name of their
> > new world order.
> > Israel has by far the best conventional military in the Middle East. I
> > have no idea why they need 200 nukes. A few ok, but 200? A deranged
> > Israeli leader could bomb the whole Europe and the Middle East back into
> > the stone age.  It's understandable, that the Europeans think the US and
> > Israel, with their aggressive posture, are #1 and #2 threats to peace.
> >



> least until it has finished exterminating the Palestinians.


Growing population at a rate of 3.9% per year is not exactly an extermination.


> 
> Aussie Infidel