Re: Al Queda Strikes the Saudis

John Slade wrote:

>      Dave, you failed to explain how the unwavering republican support for
> the terrorist regime in Saudi Arabia is all the Democrat's fault.

  Even if you properly capitalized "Republican," you'd still be wrong.

  There's a difference between "Republican" and "Bush administration,"
not to mention the obvious difference between "Republican" and
"independent" voters such as I (even though most independent voters
are kids who "mirror" the Dems).

  Were you to remain accurate you'd notice that more than once I have
lamented aloud and made worse remarks concerning the too-close
oil-interest-related ties between the too-coddling Bush people and the
Saudis.

  (The Pakistanis are even worse as US "allies," but at least with
them the oil interests aren't there and useful to the Bush people as a
worthless rationalization -- all that remains is either a hope to
support Musharraf because the alternatives are worse, or wooly-headed
"peace" nonsense that only is understandable given that both India and
Pakistan have nukes are are willing to use them, along with being
willing to bomb each other's reactors.)


  Dave Simpson