
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 20 Nov 2003 15:57:54 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman Rubin) wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >DWood78828 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>Subject: Re: Medicine is useless >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman Rubin) > >>>I do not see how it is not responsive. Contraceptive measures >>>have been easily available for the whole period; they are not >>>used by most peasant women until they have had lots of children. > >>Herman, have you ever examined the reasons that certain groups of women do not >>use contraceptives? Among the reasons, are religious views, spousal >>opposition, economic, infant and toddler mortality. > > >>They donot keep having them for the fun of it, despite what you think. > > >I never claimed that. But those who attempt to use the >arguments usually used to claim that mere education or >availability or a combination of the two are sufficient >to get women not to have children are just wishing. > >The same thing holds when one makes anything available; >people will use it as it suits THEM. To get responsible >behavior requires that the competitive forces act in the >right manners, not in having government handouts. Typical egghead elitist BS.. I wonder what your claims would be if males were the ones becoming pregnant?\ pixie
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |