Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Health Saboteur



I believe that everything ranging from airplanes to antibiotics could be
sabotaged. Evil doctors had been around for eons, and many migrated to
the United States, and some landed in Michigan. When I look back to
compare my husband's 1982 Cellulitis treatment with his 2003 Cellulites
treatment, I dare give a Health Saboteur a definition: A person (drug
prescriber/politician) that would permit false information that would result
in inferior medical treatment.

Yes, I feel that a Health Saboteur has more rights to lie about blood tests
and withhold antitumor antibiotics than I have the right to receive my most
effective antibiotics! The words "terrorist and saboteur" are
interchangeable.

>From 1981 to 1983, my husband had a neck tumor. Hubby was told that
if he wished to keep his job then he had to have the neck tumor fixed. So
Hubby went to several drug prescriber specialists. Then during Hubby's
1982 Cellulitis hospitalization, he was recommended to an Oakland
County hematologist. None of the specialists mentioned that there were
antitumor/antiviral antibiotics discovered decade's prior. The hematologist
called Hubby's neck tumor "Pre-cancer. The antitumor antibiotics weren't
given until the drug prescriber dictated. In Hubby's case the hematologist
made more money and recognition by calling Hubby's neck tumor
"Castleman-Iverson disease" than treating him with antibiotics for
Hodgkin's disease.

A century ago bacterial infection was believed to cause the Hodgkin's
disease cancer. Hubby's neck tumor was not called Hodgkin's disease
until 1983 and after the infection was strong enough to disintegrate bones!
Meanwhile in 1983, two Henry Ford Hospital specialists told Hubby and
I that the neck tumor infection probably entered the body by way of his
gums/teeth.  Of course, I complained about the withholding of antibiotics.
If thevhematologist would do that to Hubby, of course doctors/drug
prescribers would do that to me, too! Meanwhile, the Michigan dental
society was denying the fact that disease producing pathogens seep into
the blood by way of the gums/teeth.

I had been having dental problems forever. In the 1980's, the insurance
company called me in for a dental check. The purpose was to match the
payment with the dental work done. Yes, the dental work matched the
payment.  The pleasant male checker said: "Your mouth looks like you
spent your life in a dentist chair."

In 1993, I had a severe gum infection while in California. I didn't know
were to go, so I traveled to the hospital's ER. The doctor prescribed
Penicillin VK, knowing that it was only effective against gram-positive
bacteria. I felt that it was common-sense-knowledge that gram-negative
bacteria existed in the gum infection.

Now ten years later, I went to the dentist to have a tooth pulled. The
dentist prescribed penicillin VK. Well, I still have the United States made
Erythromycin that was purchased in Mexico. The Erythromycin isn't the
best gram-negative antibiotic, but like the Mexican say: "It's better than
nothing!"

The prescription drug law was passed during the Korean War (1950-1953).
I assume that we all know that more money was and still is made by
surgically
removing bacterial-damaged parts than giving the more effective antibiotics
to begin with. Lawmakers gave a Health Saboteur more rights to lie about
blood tests and withhold antitumor antibiotics than they gave me the right
to receive my most effective antibiotics!
~Rita





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.