
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Herman Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > George Conklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >"Herman Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >> DWood78828 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>Subject: Re: Medicine is useless > >> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman Rubin) > > >> >>I do not see how it is not responsive. Contraceptive measures > >> >>have been easily available for the whole period; they are not > >> >>used by most peasant women until they have had lots of children. > > >> >Herman, have you ever examined the reasons that certain groups of women > >do not > >> >use contraceptives? Among the reasons, are religious views, spousal > >> >opposition, economic, infant and toddler mortality. > > Or just the belief that they should have a half dozen > children? This seems to be the major one in India. > > > >> >They donot keep having them for the fun of it, despite what you think. > > > >> I never claimed that. But those who attempt to use the > >> arguments usually used to claim that mere education or > >> availability or a combination of the two are sufficient > >> to get women not to have children are just wishing. > > > > Wrong again Herman. Your libertarian theory has now given away to > >Fascism. > > I see nothing fascist about my views. They can go on having > the children if they want, but I do not have to support them > or their children. No one really cares about your views in India. And if you don't want to educate children, you need to get out of the public education system which supports you, your health care and the computer time.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |