
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 18 Nov 2003 16:50:56 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman Rubin) wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Gretchen Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On 16 Nov 2003 13:38:14 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman >>Rubin) wrote: > >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>Gretchen Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>On 15 Nov 2003 13:01:45 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman >>>>Rubin) wrote: > >>>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>>>George Conklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>"Herman Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>>>>> Drol Yag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ................... > > >>>>>The only non-totalitarian method available is economic. > >>>>How about simply making verious contraceptive measures easily >>>>available to all that desire them? > >>>They have been in India for the entire period during which >>>peasant women continue to have so many more children than >>>they can support. > >>Non responsive to the suggestion, Herman. > >I do not see how it is not responsive. Contraceptive measures >have been easily available for the whole period; they are not >used by most peasant women until they have had lots of children. Obviously some education is needed in India. In the US we have all sorts of objections coming forth whenever a simple matter like making contraceptives redily available. pixie
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |