Re: What is Quackery?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 John 'the Man'  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Once upon a time, our fellow Orac
>    rambled on about "Re: What is Quackery?."
> Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...
> 
> >> One can not help, but notice how you have consistently ignored my
> >> perfectly valid answers.  Are you obnoxious or just plain stupid?
> 
> >Which "valid" answers are you talking about?
> 
> The challenge was given.
> 
> The challenge was met, because I came up with one documented instance
> of success regarding the 'water cure.'  :)
> 
> And, I won!   :)

Your self-congratulation is rather premature (no surprise there). I did 
respond to your harping on the "water cure," pointing out that it is 
merely a variation of hydrotherapy and therefore not so alternative at 
all.

> Time to move on, Orac.

If you want. Got any other alleged examples of my "misrepresenting" the 
effectiveness of "alternative therapies"?

-- 
Orac        |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
            |
            |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
            | inconvenience me with questions?"