Re: What is Quackery?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 John 'the Man'  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Once upon a time, our fellow Orac
>    rambled on about "Re: What is Quackery?."
> Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...
> 
> >> Your need to keep on replying to the same post of mine, exposes your
> >> deep seated feelings of inferiority and lack of self-esteem. :(
> >
> >One can't help but notice how you dodged my question and still managed 
> >to reply to me with an ad hominem. You've become quite predictable.
> 
> One can not help, but notice how you have consistently ignored my
> perfectly valid answers.  Are you obnoxious or just plain stupid?

Which "valid" answers are you talking about?

One notes you *still* haven't produced an example of a single post where 
I "misrepresented" the effectiveness of alternative therapies.

-- 
Orac        |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
            |
            |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
            | inconvenience me with questions?"