Re: What is Quackery?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 "Jez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "Orac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >  "Jez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > "Orac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > >  "Jez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > > > > Assholes who want forced medication aren't worth a wank....
> > > >
> > > > Tsk, tsk. I love it when you resort to ad hominems. It means you can't
> > > > deal with me on a rational basis and therefore resort to insults.
> > > >
> > > Nah, just boredom.
> >
> > If you're so "bored" I have to wonder why you reliably respond to so
> > many of my posts. You must love boredom. Either that, or you're not as
> > "bored" as you claim.
> 
> 'Y....a....w....n.'...................
> 
> Yeah, pretty bored.

One notes that, for all your feigned "boredom," you still responded.

-- 
Orac        |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
            |
            |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
            | inconvenience me with questions?"