
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Orac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "Marko Proberto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > "Jez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Ahh but as long as the studies are done on adults.....
> > > > it PROVES it's safe for kids to use.........
> > > > Great Science eh !!
> > >
> > > Are you claiming that it has *never* been studied on kids? Since you do
> have
> > > a problem answering a direct question. let me help you:
> > >
> > > [ ] Yes, I am claiming that it has never been tested on children.
> > > [ ] No, I am not claiming that it has never been tested on children.
> >
> > Sadly, it's useless to expect a straight answer from this guy. He hasn't
> > given one yet that I've seen.
>
> It has not been approved for use on children.
See what I mean? He didn't answer the question.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |