Re: What is Quackery?

"Orac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>  "Jez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Orac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > >  "Jez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Really? There's lots of evidence in the published scientific
> > literature
> > > > > that it does work. Could you kindly show me the evidence
demonstrating
> > > > > that it doesn't work, describe the specific flaws in the evidence
> > > > > supporting its use, and put together a coherent argument showing
that
> > > > > your evidence trumps the existing evidence supporting
fluoridation?
> > > >
> > > > Why bother?
> > >
> > > Because you made an assertion and if you don't even try to back it up
> > > you lose what little credibility you had to begin with?
> > >
> > > Of course, I suppose a little thing like your credibility means
nothing
> > > to you, based on your behavior here.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Assholes who want forced medication aren't worth a wank....
> > >
> > > Tsk, tsk. I love it when you resort to ad hominems. It means you can't
> > > deal with me on a rational basis and therefore resort to insults.
> > >
> > Nah, just boredom.
>
> If you're so "bored" I have to wonder why you reliably respond to so
> many of my posts. You must love boredom. Either that, or you're not as
> "bored" as you claim.

'Y....a....w....n.'...................

Yeah, pretty bored.

-- 
Ho hum
Jez
 "Few of us can easily surrender our belief that
society must somehow make sense.  The thought
that the State has lost its mind and is punishing so
many innocent people is intolerable. And so the
evidence has to be internally denied."
- Arthur Miller