Re: political test

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:58:33 GMT, "George Conklin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>"Herman Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Gretchen Evans  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >On 12 Nov 2003 09:07:28 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman
>> >Rubin) wrote:
>>
>> >>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> >>Gretchen Evans  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>On 9 Nov 2003 15:38:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman
>> >>>Rubin) wrote:
>>
>> >>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> >>>>Gretchen Evans  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>>On 7 Nov 2003 11:11:35 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman
>> >>>>>Rubin) wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> >>>>>>Gretchen Evans  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>On 3 Nov 2003 11:13:53 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman
>> >>>>>>>Rubin) wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> >>>>>>>>Bettina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> ......................
>>
>>
>> >No one is suggesting that you 'evict' others.. Purchase their land and
>> >have at it.
>>
>> Since early in the 20th century, this has not been
>> considered acceptable.  The squatters on the land
>> do not have the right to sell it, except as indicated
>> by eminent domain.  Even the trading of population,
>> as was done between Greece and Turkey in the 1920s,
>> is not considered acceptable.
>>
>> >>We have, according to "standard" polling organizations, at
>> >>least 10 million Americans who want such a society.  This
>> >>should be enough to have some way to found their own country,
>> >>but at this time, it can only be done by evicting others.
>>
>> >Let's see, close to 300 million in the U.S., and you claim 'at least'
>> >10 million.. Just a tad short of a majority wouldn't you say?  So if
>> >you can't make the change here in this country then the only other
>> >solution is to find another area... see above.
>>
>> This is exactly what the libertarians want.  And 10
>> million is more than the population of a lot of members
>> of the UN.
>
>  10 million is just a few percent of the population.  Libertarians have
>never been able to run a government, and never will be able to.
>

We're certainly in agreement with that statement.. But how could
Livertarians 'run' a government when they don't believe in one in the
first place?

pixie