
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"George Conklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Herman Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Drol Yag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Better let more people die, especially old ones, saves money and there > > >will be no overpopulation ! > > > > The effect on overpopulation will be quite small. > > > > Most of the world's overpopulation comes from places > > where medical care is poor, and to the extent > > medicine contributes to it, it does so by reducing > > maternal and childhood, especially infant, deaths. > > Herman, the only way the birth rate comes down is when infant mortality > rate drops radically and people decide they don't need replacement children. > You get a lower birth rate by reducing infant mortality. In underdeveloped countries you get a lower birth rate when property rights are respected. Until then, only a person's children are a reliable source of future wealth.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |