Re: Medicare Means Test

"Herman Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Gretchen Evans  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 9 Nov 2003 15:27:43 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman
> >Rubin) wrote:
>
> >>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>Gretchen Evans  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>On 7 Nov 2003 12:54:34 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman
> >>>Rubin) wrote:
>
> >>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>>>Gretchen Evans  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 22:12:31 -0700, "Founding Father" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>wrote:
>
>
> >>>>>>"Gretchen Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>> On 3 Nov 2003 12:18:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman
> >>>>>>> Rubin) wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>>>>>> >Gretchen Evans  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> >>On 30 Oct 2003 16:56:40 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DWood78828)
wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> >>>>Subject: Re: Medicare Means Test
> >>>>>>> >>>>From: Gretchen Evans
>
> ...................
>
>
>
> >But there aren't 90% on charity or seeking assistance, what's the
> >point?
>
> You are treating all as being on medical charity.  You would
> force government rationing, as the resources are not there.
>

   You keep coming back to the so-called FAct that unless we have 43 million
uninsured, then there will not be enough medicine for YOU.  Is that a FAct,
or just a paranoid fear?