
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Gretchen Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 22:12:31 -0700, "Founding Father" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > >"Gretchen Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> On 3 Nov 2003 12:18:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman > >> Rubin) wrote: > >> > >> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >> >Gretchen Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>On 30 Oct 2003 16:56:40 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DWood78828) wrote: > > >> >>>>Subject: Re: Medicare Means Test > >> >>>>From: Gretchen Evans > >> > > >> > ................... > >> > > >> >>And as to the financing, all he has to do is to stop sending the $87B > >> >>to Iraq and he's got it made. > >> > > >> >That $87B is worth it; it is the $300B going to support > >> >the inefficient entitlements which is not. > >> > >> Wonderful, Herman. YOU send YOUR bucks over there I'd much prefer to > >> aid our own people.. And who are YOU to make a determination that > >> someone isn't 'worth' an expendature to improve their healthcare? > >> > >> pixie > > > >Great idea! Those of us who recognize that the federal government's primary > >purpose is to keep us and our property safe from attack will pay the taxes > >for national defense. Those of you who believe the federal government was > >created to give out free health care and welfare can pay those taxes. By > >the way, the former share is about 20% of the budget (way down from its > >historical level of 50%), the latter, about 70%. > > > OK, please remit your portion of the $200 Billion or so that Bushie > and the rest of your warhawks have blown in this latest fiasco. > > pixie And while you're at it, please explain why spending $200 billion on Iraq makes a robber, murderer, rapist, sniper or terrorist less likely in our communities. Bettina
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |