
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Once upon a time, our fellow Happy Dog rambled on about "Re: homeopathy, is it effective, research review.." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ... >> >This is not a good example of support for homoepathy. Not at all. >> >> You have not offered any support for your outlandish positions. None >> what soever. > >Actually, he did, 'lil girly boy. In fact, almost everyone who has posted >an opposing POV on this topic has. In the future, kindly STOP lying, Happy Dog! I shall repeat it for the benefit of the intellectually challenged science geeks on these ngs. You Geeks have *not* offered any support for your outlandish positions. None what soever. We, the reform movement against Medical Scientism, already know that you Geeks are arrogant!!!! Please tell us something new, that we already don't know. Your THREADs are just plain stupid and unscientific. If NASA used the your notion of science to get to the Moon, we would still be orbiting earth with dogs. Just thought that you might want to know. :) You Geeks are pathetic! Just my opinion. But, I am *right* as usual!
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |