Re: Gun control doesn't work--so what?

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:57:47 +0000, Shaun
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 07:47:47 GMT, Clive Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:57:34 +0000, Shaun
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:24:29 -0800, "John C. Randolph"
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Kane wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 02 Dec 2003 06:41:30 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey C. Dege)
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> >On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:14:39 GMT, Trevor Wilson
>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>"Bert Hyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>>> >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >In that sense, it works well.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Really? Where?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>Japan
>>>>> >>The UK
>>>>> >>Australia
>>>>> >>Sweden
>>>>> >>Holland
>>>>> >>Germany
>>>>> >>Every other Western, developed nation (except the US)
>>>>> >>Et al
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Which of those countries saw a decline in violent crime after gun
>>>>> control
>>>>> >was introduced?  None of them that I am familiar with.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hey! Germany.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gun crime dropped.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Executions of then rendered helpless citizens did go up just a tad
>>>>> though...6 mill or so.
>>>>
>>>>More like 10 million.  Six Million were Jews, the rest were anyone else
>>>>that the nazis wanted dead.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You forgot to mention the several millions who did in fact have guns,
>>>which totally failed to protect them
>>
>>Facts? Figures? or is this more little White Feather garbage?
>>
>>
>It is in fact a curious piece of gun nut folk law that claims a few
>lightly armed Jewish civilians would have more success in defeating
>Nazi Germany compared to the four years it took the Red Army.

As usual, little Worm is incapable of answering a question and
obfuscates with his usual wraith-like diatribe.

Want to answer the question, little Worm? oh, you can't can you -
situation normal.