Re: Gun control doesn't work--so what?

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 07:47:47 GMT, Clive Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:57:34 +0000, Shaun
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:24:29 -0800, "John C. Randolph"
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Kane wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 02 Dec 2003 06:41:30 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey C. Dege)
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> >On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:14:39 GMT, Trevor Wilson
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>"Bert Hyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>> >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> >In that sense, it works well.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Really? Where?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Japan
>>>> >>The UK
>>>> >>Australia
>>>> >>Sweden
>>>> >>Holland
>>>> >>Germany
>>>> >>Every other Western, developed nation (except the US)
>>>> >>Et al
>>>> >
>>>> >Which of those countries saw a decline in violent crime after gun
>>>> control
>>>> >was introduced?  None of them that I am familiar with.
>>>> 
>>>> Hey! Germany.
>>>> 
>>>> Gun crime dropped.
>>>> 
>>>> Executions of then rendered helpless citizens did go up just a tad
>>>> though...6 mill or so.
>>>
>>>More like 10 million.  Six Million were Jews, the rest were anyone else
>>>that the nazis wanted dead.
>>>
>>
>>You forgot to mention the several millions who did in fact have guns,
>>which totally failed to protect them
>
>Facts? Figures? or is this more little White Feather garbage?
>
>
It is in fact a curious piece of gun nut folk law that claims a few
lightly armed Jewish civilians would have more success in defeating
Nazi Germany compared to the four years it took the Red Army.