
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Eric Neale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Leon Macfayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> > When I said "that sucks" that was in reference to the guys threats. Would it > > have been more noble to condone them? > > The problem is that you did: > > "That sucks. He obviously has some rough edges but we can iron them out. The > principles displayed up to this point are very very good." No, the problem is you cannot read even when you spell it out. I said THAT SUCKS - I then put a full stop. That means thats the end of that sentiment. I then referred to his obvious rough edges - thats the bit where he wishes people dead. I then said we can iron them out - meaning someone who hates guns must have some base level of intelligence. I then said the principles displayed UNTIL that point were very good - meaning everything UNTIL the bit where he wished people dead was very good. Now we have dissected this time and again. I have now explained it slowly to you sentence by sentence and sentiment by sentiment. Can you PLEASE make an effort to understand it before replying and making me go through it all again? That means no 5 second glib replies - genuinely try and read it. >> > > "I can only hope that your mother, wife and children get gunned down > > > and die slowly when they are walking the streets quietly minding > > > their own business. Maybe this will teach you a lesson you sick fuck." > > > > > > > > > > The principles he displayed UNTIL this point were very very good. The above > > sucked. And you cant comprehend which particular part? > > > > > Oh I think you made yourself clear. Well thank fucking christ. And how long did it take you? > > > Where did you say the threats against her family were inexcusable? > > > You didn't! It looked to me like you were excusing them. > > > > > > I said - THAT SUCKS!!!!!!!! > > So you are agreeing with me on this point? Good. LOL You are one brain dead guy. I agreed that that sucks since the very very first response. Its you that has insisted on debating that I did not say what I in fact DID say for post after post. > > > But they do in any situation where an honest person would need a gun > > > to save their life. That is the point. > > > > And your opinion sucks too. > > > My my, are you in the third grade? 2nd and trying. > > > Wow. Holding a conservative political view is equivalent to wishing > > > someone's child was dead. > > > > > > Umm they both suck. So does having marmite on toast. What the fuck are you > > talking about? > > Your post - of course. Ok lets dissect this bit too - when did I state that holding a conservative political view is the equivalent of wishing a child dead?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |