Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Gun Banner Wishes My Family to Be Murdered and Die Slowly



"Eric Neale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Leon Macfayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > It probably reminds you that one of them does. Bit paranoid there?
> > > >
> > > Naw the guy is a nitwit.
> >
> > So thats a reason to say ALL anti gunners want her dead?
> >
>
> Nope.  Taking away the guns from people who might need them to survive
> is a reason.

Hardly. But in your own warped world with your own warped reasoning and
patriotically indocrinated crappy beliefs, I can see why you say that.



> > > No need to state your silly beliefs again.
> >
> > Thats what free speech is all about - one of the freedoms remember? The
ones
> > you are always jibbering on about?
> >
>
> Learn to read.  He said "no need".  He didn't say you would go to jail
> if you state your silly beliefs again.



Learn to read - I said its what free speech is all about. I didnt say he was
against free speech or that he would go to jail for saying there was no
need. Cock.

 He is just trying to tell you
> that we got it the first time you told us, and the second, and the
> third, and the ninty-second . . .

Why dont you shut up now and stop going over old ground then? You dont reply
with anything new and I wouldnt write to myself. So if you dont want to keep
hearing it, try shutting up.



>
> I just love people who respond to criticism with "freedom of speach".

Speech even - would have thought you would know such an important thing.



> Hello! - it works both ways.  That means a critic can present the
> opposing view too!

Yep - and frequently does - so when did I say he couldnt? And when did he
lose the balls to speak for himself and appoint whoever you actually are to
be a mouthpiece?


> > > Those are teh summation of  his principles you twit.
> >
> > No the summation of his principles are that guns are disgusting and
should
> > be banned. His opinion as to the death of an innocent child is out of
order.
>
> Then it sure looks like you put your praise it the wrong spot.

How exactly? I said I agreed with the bit about guns whilst not agreeing
with the bit about hurting children. Seems I wrote it exactly as I meant
it - yet still you cant read or understand it.



 Boy
> you must feel embarassed.

Yeah right. Last time I felt embarassed was when I woke up at 11am with your
mum and realised I hadnt crept out at 2am under cover of darkness.



 By the way those principles are wrong.
> Your own police carry those not-so-disgusting tools and banning guns
> gives the criminals an devastating advantage.


Criminals find guns very hard to come by. We had 2 armed robberies here
yesterday - no guns. Yet again.


>> > > > Thats the key. People in the UK rarely need to.
> > > >
> > > People in the UK cannot.
> >
> >
> > Because of the above.
>
> Because the law forbids people from haveing a decent chance to defend
> themselves.

Nope - it bans the weapons which kill most people the easiest.


Oh sure if you happen to be carring a fountain pen or
> there just happens to be a knife laying at your feet when you are
> attacked you can pick that up - otherwise you can die.



Or you can stay the fuck out of violent areas and exercise some sensible
avoidance techniques and surprise surprise an innocent person is rarely
attacked. If you go to nightclubs on a friday night in my twon, leave pissed
and walk home alone, especially if you are female then it is likely someone
will attack you. I see it every week. Now you could say that female should
strap herself up like a one girl army with tools or you COULD say she should
get some brains, dont leave so late, dont get so drunk, dont WALK home on
her OWN and generally get a fucking life before someone takes hers away.

> > > > And due to guns being so easily available, there are plenty of
people
> >  able
> > > > to do you harm.
> > > >
> > > The opposite is true.
> >
> > Thats why your country is so safe eh? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> As long as you stay out of gang teritory you will be fine.

Thats the US out of bounds then - how about Canada?


> > > > Yes you would. Any time one person kills another, no matter how
> >  justified
> >  it
> > > > was, unless you are subhuman, you will lose sleep at the very least.
> > > >
> > > Depends.
> >
> >
> > Yeah - on whether you are subhuman.
> >
>
> Oh my what a clever come back.  Did you think of that all by yourself?

It was quite an easy one to such a glib and silly prior response.


> > > > Ok its grown old now.
> > > >
> > > You always do.
> >
> >
> >
> > Yo momma.
>
> Okay I am dying to know.  How does that sound with a British accent?
> Can you write it phoneticaly?

Sure - Yo  and Mom Ma



>
> Would it be:  'O Mumi  ?



No.





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.