
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
AE wrote: > Alan Wostenberg wrote: > >> You do not claim you yourself to be tolerant (for a truly tolerant >> person would tolerate another's intolerance). And neither does your >> opponent claim himself to be tolerant. Where is the disagreement? > > Well - in his initial posting he claimed Christianity would not be > intolerant. > > The whole disagreement is about that point: I don't think Christianity > is tolerant - it can't be due to it's premisses assumptions and I don't > think it should try to be.
>> Patience is numbered among the classic virtues, but in what system is >> tolerance a virtue? > > > In no well defined system, I'd guess. > > Interestingly in our modern societies tolerance is seen as something > very important.
> Maybe that's why religions like Christianity are not any more accepted > as well as in the past?
>> ... >> Granted, truth is intolerant. Of err. Is that a problem? > > The problem is not proven truth, but problems are occuring as soon as > somebody that might or might not be right believes to be the sole owner > of truth. > > I don't think we should do that step as far as religion is concerned or > we will go the risk to start crusades once again.
-- Alan Wostenberg Spin beads? http://www.theLightOfHeaven.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |