Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: !Pig Watching... 1 of 236



Carol wrote:
> ZombyWoof wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:08:10 -0500, "Carol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote something wonderfully witty:
>>
>> <snip>
>>>>
>>> What is this with the personal information posting? Geez, what a
>>> mess this place has become, and lots of very juvenile and bad
>>> behavior. I know that the schools were closed for the holiday, but
>>> really people....
>>>
>>> Carol
>>>
>> While I rightly don't know you are every bit as guilty as those you
>> condemn.  You reposted the very same information again when you
>> replied to this message.  Noticed how I snipped it out prior to
>> responding to you?
>>
>>
> First; I disagree that I am as 'guilty' as those I  "condemn'. I
> reposted it in error. I had intended to edit my reply, but for some
> reason, MSN kept kicking me off line and I had to keep reconnecting.
> This was a constant problem, coupled with the fact that I am still
> relatively new to OE. I got back on, forgot that it was not edited
> (very easy for someome with Fibro and cognitive problems, as well as
> CP), and rushed to send it off before I got booted again. Using
> _your_ reasoning, I guess that makes you in agreement with Juba about
> Jennie reposting it too? People do make _mistakes_ , or are you so
> perfect that you are above such things?  When I pointed out to Juba
> that Codeee had done the same thing as Jennie, I also ackowledged
> that I had made the same error. Juba's reply was that Codeee would
> most likely admit that she did so in error. Like me, it was not
> intentional and/or with malice. But Juba feels that Jennie is dodging
> the issue and won't even admit to it being done in error. So he
> assumes that she did so with intent, to make sure the info was
> aechived.
>
> Second; the person who originally posted the information did so with
> malice and intent. I did not. I don't think that even Jennie, or
> Codeee (who I pointed out to Juba _also_ reposted it) did so either.
> Since then, Jennie has posted links to Rack's personal info that is
> archived in Google. I know that there was at least one reply to that
> post of hers that was not snipped of the links that take you directly
> to the same information. I think the point she was making is that her
> accidental repost is not all that harmful, as it is readily available
> at Google.
>
>
>>
>> Oh and one more thing.  Don't feed the Trolls.  Quit responding to
>> them.
>
>
> Please don't advise me as to whom I should or should not reply to. I
> had the trolls killfiled, but some of them morphed their way out of
> my filter. I am not the only one who has replied to any of them
> either. They posted the private information about Codeee, then about
> Hawkii. People replied to the trolls postings, I did not see the
> originals, because those nyms were blocked, but I saw the replies, of
> which a number copied and pasted the same info over-and-over again.
> Now Juba decides to harp on Jennie, and for some unknown reason, you
> decide to judge my intent and condemn me as being on the same level
> as the troll who posted the OP. When I saw the post, I felt compelled
> to make a comment in general, regarding this behavior. Just as people
> did to the trolls posting about Codeee and Hawkii. Where was the
> outrage about replying to the trolls then? Hawkii had a running
> conversation with them at one point. I don't know about you, but I
> have a moral compass that draws the line, and IMHO, the trolls,
> including Juba, crossed it at one point. So, I let those who morphed
> out of my KF, and Juba, know in very few words, that they went to
> far; before returning them to Plonk status. The trolls are supposedly
> still human beings, even they sometimes have to know that not
> everyone agrees with the level they have sunk to. I draw the line at
> them and Juba suggesting that certain people should commit a certain
> act. I hardly fed them anything, AFAIK they haven't even responded. I
> made my opnion known, they know how at least one person feels. There
> are much bigger problems that are disrupting this NG than my making a
> few short comments to a few unknowns nyms trolling in here.
>
>
> This is, after all, a chronic pain NG. Some of us are affected by
> that, as well as by meds, inability to sleep, etc. That can, and
> does, have an affect on posting here. If you note my posting times,
> it was when I should have been in bed sleeping. I really wasn't
> paying all that much attention to who I was replying to. There was so
> much junk to wade through, and I thought I had the trolls in KF. I
> just saw what they wrote and it irked me. However one may feel about
> Codeee or Ruada, being trolls gives them know excuse to say what they
> did. Period.  Being silent is _not_ necessarily the correct action.
> If you disagree with that, please feel free to just skip my posts or
> block them alltogether. I don't take marching orders from you, or
> anybody else. Otherwise, how about we agree to disagree on this one.
>
>
> Carol


PS You consider Juba to be a troll, do you not? So why are you replying to
posts of his?


Carol





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.