
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Capitalist Pig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:28:00 -0500, Bob LeChevalier ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Capitalist Pig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:43:46 -0500, Bob LeChevalier >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>Absolutely. My emotions render me superior to a machine. >>> >>>Isn't it funny the Universe had to wait billions of years to reach a >>>stage where biological machines would be able to think clearly about >>>itself, for those machines to decide to act like any other animal >>>instead? >> >>Human beings cannot think clearly about themselves. They are biased >>by self-interest. > >Now you only need to demonstrate that somehow this bias of yours >renders you superior to a machine. It does. Why? Because I say so. One of the advantages of not being reliant on logic is that I can have an opinion without "proving it". >>>The principle I start with, and one I am not willing to reject, is >>>that individuals own themselves. >> >>I don't accept that axiom, and indeed find it morally questionable >>that the concept of ownership should apply to human beings at all. >>Hence your philosophy is utterly worthless to me. > >Ownership means having control over. Nobody has control over themselves (or over anyone else). Proof? When the grim reaper comes, in whatever way he does, you are gone. >By self-ownership, an individual >is able to claim full control over him or herself (and strictly him or >herself). Why do you find this questionable? Because I am a realist and I know that we don't understand ourselves well enough to control ourselves. lojbab -- lojbab [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |