Re: Baghdad Bush

On 1 Dec 2003 16:13:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Neale)
wrote:

>che guevara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Neale 
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> >che guevara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
>> >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >
>> ><snip>
>> >> worse for you...on the whole i am of no political shade . . .
>> >
>> >
>> >Yet you wrote:
>> >
>> >with Ms Clinton touring Afghanistan and having Thanksgiving Day lunch
>> >with U.S. troops, that left GWB with only option...right?
>> >
>> >So the evidence indicates otherwise.
>> >
>> 
>> I did pose a question at the end and to me, a cynic, it looked a logical 
>> sequence.  otoh, bush poses in military gear with the military when he 
>> can, so his visit outside of the clinton thung was no big surprise
>> 
>> >
>> >Both HC and GB deserve props for risking their lives to support our
>> >troops.  Is it so hard to belive that both might have done it for the
>> >right reason?
>> 
>> quite possibly, but both are politicians. i'm not sure how human that 
>> makes them. when you look at what their foes say about them they should 
>> be blood sucking werewolves : )
>
>They are politicians but I think they are the good kind.  They did
>take a risk and no mater what their motives (Okay it could be a
>multitude of motives incluing votes) they did something good for the
>troops.  I think they set a good example.
 
No disagreement there, on either count.