Re: Price gouging is beneficial. Price gouging is great!

Bob LeChevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (rex) wrote:
> >It is frightening how commonplace that response has become and how the
> >people who provide that response to one subject (e.g. schools) NEVER
> >OPENLY expand the response as was done in the Union of Soviet
> >Socialist Republics, Communist China, the National Socialist German
> >Workers Party, Cuba, etc.
> 
> Maybe because we know that different subjects demand different
> answers. 

Maybe becuase you believe that different subjects demand the same
answer: your totalitarian socialist cliches.
 
> >It is as if the people who use that simplistic response
> 
> It is YOUR simplistic response that is at issue, not something that
> you are trying to pretend I said, that I did not.

It is YOUR simplistic response that is at issue, not something that
you are trying to pretend you said, that you did not.

> >do not know all the horrible ideologies that have used that same response.
> 
> I don't much care what horrid ideologies have "used that same
> response".  I am sure that horrid ideologies have claimed that 2+2=4,
> but your argument would demand a different answer because one cannot
> say something that a horrid ideology also says.
> 
> How trite.

We all realize that you don't much care that horrid ideologies have
"used that same response".  We all realize that you are sure what
horrid ideologies have claimed.  And your argument demands the same
answer because one should not say something that a horrid ideology
also says.  How trite.

> >Very frightening.
> 
> Your ilk certainly would be, if more than a couple percent of the
> population didn't think you were full of shit.

Your ilk certainly would be, if more than a couple percent of the
population didn't think you were full of shit.  That is why you
advocate government violence and government coercion, because no one
will voluntarily do what you wish.  That is also why the former Union
of Soviet Socialist Republics, Communist China and the National
Socialist German Workers' Party are the top killers in that order,
because no one would follow your totalitarian cliches.

> >You do not think philosophically about the range of your own comments,
> 
> Philosophy is for losers like you.

Totalitarian socialism is for losers like you.
 
> >Point to any website or even other
> >group posts where you attempt to explain any political philsophy or
> >philosophy of government that you hold (you hold none, other than
> >rubber-stamp statism)
> 
> I hold none. Period.  

Thank you for conceding.  

> >You can point to nothing. 
> 
> Why should I. I think for myself, rather than letting Ayn Rand and
> company think for me.

You don't think for yourself, you let the former Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics, Communist China, and the National Socialist
German Workers' Party, Marx, Stalin, Bismarck, Mao etc., and company
think for you.