
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Its about time. There are so many better assault rifles. The M-16 was only medicore. The article talks about the Kalishinkov but there is better. For example the German G-36, Lee-Enfield L85, the Styr AUG, the FN-FAL, even the FAMAS were better rifles. I like the British FN2000 its very similar to the OICW but much smaller. BTW the OICW was never expected to fully replace the M-16 or M4 but to replace the M249 and other LMG. Its designed for Infantry support not as a infantry rifle. "Arnold Wolfcastle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Laura Bush - America's kid-killer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > "Karl Hungus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > BAGHDAD, Iraq - After nearly 40 years of battlefield service around the > > > globe, the M-16 may be on its way out as the standard Army assault rifle > > > because of flaws highlighted during the invasion and occupation of Iraq . . > > > . > > > > > > http://makeashorterlink.com/?D2BB26D96 > > > > It's your typical over-engineered american product. > > Thank LBJ & Robert McNamara for rushing it into production during > JFK's Vietnam War. > > > Does everything > > but work right. Like our idiotic cars with warning lights for the > > windshield washer fluid jug. The AK47 is much better. Incidentally, > > the guy who designed the AK a million or so years ago is still alive. > > Read an interview with him the other day.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |