
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"JTEM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > "chris alden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > I don't know if this has already been addressed in > > previous responses, or even if it's superfluous at > > this point, but I think it's unfair to group the three > > major religions of the world together and blur the > > distinctions almost completely. > > The three "major" religions? I'm sorry, I was a little vague. I didn't mean to imply that all of those religions were somehow better than the others (although I do happen to subscribe to one of them exclusively). For these purposes, I was referring to Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, (albeit our society is becoming more protective of Islam, prompted by the anti-Muslim reaction some people had in the wake of 9/11), as the three religions which people generally target as being "intolerant" or "judgmental". Most of that sentiment comes from the acceptance of what our society refers to as the "Eastern" religions -- meaning to them those religions that advocate an acceptance of relative truth and morality claims. Of course, that's not necessarily true for those religions, but that's what the popular perception is, and I assume that there's already a thread lurking on alt.philosophy for a more detailed analysis of that. Sorry for the confusion!
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |