Re: Re: Are Islam and Democracy Incompatible?

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 01:20:52 -0800, Jim Balter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>Actually Bush doesn't mean anything by "Democracy" -- it's just a
>sound chosen by professional message crafters to elicit a certain
>emotional response in the audience.  There's no causal or operational
>relationship between the utterance and actual policies or events,
>beyond the necessity to craft some events in consonance with maintaining
>these emotional responses.  For instance, a big deal was made about
>the Taliban's treatment of women, so as to justify bombing
>Afghan rubble into smaller rubble.  To bolster this fraudulent
>justification, there was a big media todo about an Afghan woman
>(a legitimate leader and proponent of Afghan women's rights)
>being a part of the provisional Afghan government following
>the invasion.  But as soon as the cameras were turned off she
>was kicked out of the ruling council.  The conditions for
>Afghan women (and in fact all Afghanis) are as bad as ever,
>but a belief to the contrary was firmly planted in the minds of Americans.

   In America the conditions for men are as bad as ever.

"Notice to all Men, wake up and smell the Coffee..

*The governments has pressured most large organizations into giving
women
preferences in hiring and promotions.
*Men and Boys are being driven out of the University's, Public
Schools,
which have been re-designed solely for girls' way of learning. And Men
are
starting to avoid college because of the hostile feminist climate. So
women
are moving ahead of men in getting advanced degrees. More promotions
for
women.
*The IRS code provides at least six subsidies encouraging women to
divorce
their husbands when the excitement wears off. (Around three-quarters
of
divorces are initiated by women.) This has destroyed the Family as we
know
it.
*Family courts (under the legislature's standards) routinely deprive
fathers
of their children. When the Courts say Fathers have no Rights,
Furthermore,
the courts normally refuse to enforce even minimal visitation rights
when
mothers prevent fathers from seeing the children, and refuse to do
anything
to stop false Allegations.
*Family violence protective orders are widely used to get fathers out
of the
house so that women can get sole custody more easily, all based on
false
information and again false Allegations, because the laws want it that
way.
*Court-ordered payments to ex-wives are exorbitant, typically
one-third or
more of a father's take-home pay. (My own son was ordered to pay
almost
two-thirds of the income from his first, low-paying job.)
*Courts often refuse to lower so-called child-support amounts when
fathers'
income drops. When fathers become delinquent, they are publicly
smeared as
"deadbeats," and often jailed. In fact, the Bradley Amendment
prohibits any
reduction in "child-support" arrears, even if the father is totally
disabled, So men's suicide has rising even more so, because that is
the goal
of the Feminist to keep men beaten down.
*Courts order men to pay "child support" even when the children aren't
theirs. And this may be a far-from isolated problem in an age where
DNA-testing companies say that up to one-third of all children are not
sired
by the man named by the mother, but at the same time mothers can
refuse
fathers the right to have fathers names on the birth certificate,
which is
back up by the courts.
*.. Men are often arrested when neighbors, or a
ex-wife or girlfriend calls the police, regardless of the evidence at
the
scene when officers arrive, because that is what the police have to
do, when
the laws of the Country state them to do just that.

We are living in a New Age, where a New Order has been put in place on
Men,
Children, all for the Sake of Money, and Radical man hating Feminism.
Stand up Men and say "No more", this has to stop

Baze
www.spearhead-uk.com        http://www.natvan.com
http://www.altermedia.info/     www.nsm88.com
http://www.nationalism.org/rnsp/display_ENG.htm