
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Pat Hines wrote:
Roger wrote:
"David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roger wrote:
<snip>
It seems almost unfair to pick on the historically challenged.
There is no individual right to keep and bear arms. Look at the court decisions. Look at the law. If there was such a right, the gun control
laws
on the books would have been overturned. They have not.
The right to keep and bear arms existed, and was utilized, on April `9, 1775. It was reaffirmed the next year in the Declaration of Independence. If you deny the right to keep and bear arms, I such you swear your allegiance to your Queen.
There is no individual right to keep and bear arms. Look at the court decisions. Look at the law. If there was such a right, the gun control laws on the books would have been overturned. They have not.
I am looking at court cases wherein the courts affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual right. There are over 90 of them.
No, you are looking at Kopel/Halbrook's bogus list of cases, in which THEY, and NOT the courts, blatantly assert that there is an affirmed individual right, even if they are NOT EVEN 2nd Amen cases by any stretch, or that anything more than a simple citing of the Amen itself appears.
Here's what I told you the other day, but you just can't be bothered to be educated:
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |