Re: Brits could use a NRA chapter...

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 02:44:16 GMT, "betweentheeyes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"Jim Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:53:01 GMT, "betweentheeyes"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >"Jim Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:08:43 -0600, John A. Stovall
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:01:44 -0800, "Mike Haas"
>> >> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>"John A. Stovall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Just look at all the Gun Control the NRA has supported here.   The
>NRA
>> >> >>> is for Gun Control.
>> >> >>> ******************************************************
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> "The National Rifle Association has been in support of
>> >> >>>  workable, enforceable gun control legislation since its
>> >> >>>  very inception in 1871."
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>     NRA Executive Vice President Franklin L. Orth
>> >> >>>     NRA's American Rifleman Magazine, March 1968, P. 22
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Hmmm - pulling statements out of context from 35 years ago.  Yep,
>that's
>> >> >>Stovall.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Mike Haas
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >And it hasn't changed in 35 years has it Mike?
>> >> >
>> >> >Was the NRA President at Knob Creek last month showing how it supports
>> >> >full auto owners?
>> >>
>> >> Nope, but the whole board was at the 50 Caliber shoot in Nevada because
>> >the
>> >> FCSSA invited and hosted them for a day.
>> >
>> >You lucky dog, you!
>>
>> Yep, and it worked for FCSSA, too. They not only reached full
>understanding of
>> their issues with the NRA BOD, they also picked up a number of members.
>So,
>> John A. needs to get with the program if showing up at Knob Hill is his
>litmus
>> test of the NRA board's commitment to RKBA. 'Course, FCSSA members
>furnished the
>> hardware and the ammo. Some were reloading on the spot. Not cheap no
>matter how
>> you go at it.
>>
>Did ya hit anything?  How far?

600 yards.  Got the bull usually, but reading the wind was the harder part.
There was a gusty cross wind that kept the group from being anything remarkable.
They tried to have the rifles sighted-in, but you couldn't zero that wind.


>