
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"John A. Stovall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:45:21 -0800, "Allan Lindsay-O'Neal" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >"John A. Stovall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> And just what's the perfect case, Mikey? Where do you draw the line > >> and go with what you've got. > > > >A lady school teacher living in a rough part of town who keeps a revolver in > >her glove compartment and gets arrested for violating a state "gun law." > > > >Not this mess brought about by a rugby team captain fond of posing with his > >skinned head and rifles for the press. > > > > So the basic right doesn't matter but we must pick an acceptable > person's right to defend? > > Funny idea you have when it come to defending basic rights. > > In fact the viler the person the more important their basic rights be > defended. > > Repugnance is in the eye of the beholder. -*MORT*-
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |