Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: CAN THE STATE MILITIAS EVER BE ABOLISHED?



"Yardpilot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Morton Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Yardpilot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "The Lone Weasel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Robert S. Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > >
> > > > > The Lone Weasel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 29 Nov
> > > > > 2003 18:27:30 GMT Message-ID:
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >>Peter H. Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > > > >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > > >>> On 28 Nov 2003 19:46:56 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>> (Leif Rakur) wrote:
> > > > >>>>When the Second Amendment was written, the states already
> > > > >>>>had their militias.  The amendment was about protecting
> > > > >>>>the people in their right to continue their state militia
> > > > >>>>systems of security without infringement from the federal
> > > > >>>>government.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>      Actually,  it was protecting the "Right of the
> > > > >>>      People" separate
> > > > >>> from the states.   Otherwise,  it would have said
> > > > >>> "states" as in the 10th amendment.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security
> > > > >>of a free state..."
> > > > >>
> > > > >>You boys have a real problem with that part of the Second
> > > > >>Amendment.  How can you just delete the states from the
> > > > >>Second Amendment then insert "individuals" for "the
> > > > >>people"?
> > > > >
> > > > >   RSB: The 'security of a free state' is not referring to
> > > > >   state security, it is referring to the continuing liberty
> > > > >   of the people. How can you ignore that the concept of
> > > > >   freedom applies to individuals?
> > > >
> > > > The two are synonymous according to the Second Amendment.
> > >
> > > English evidently confuses you.
> > >
> > >
> > Does Lee understand that the primary function of our government, by oath
> of
> > office, is to preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States
> of
> > America?
>
> Do you really think he cares? All he really wants is any attention he can
> get.
>
>
According to law, Lee is a domestic enemy.

-*MORT*-





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.