
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Carl Nisarel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > While I was fishing in the dull canal, Joseph Lovell mumbled: > Carl Nisarel wrote: > > > > >>"Carl Nisarel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > .... > > > >>>Suicide isn't 'means independent'. Suicides generally are > > >>>impulsive acts and since guns are more effective, using a > > >>>gun is more likely to lead to a successful suicide. The > > >>>general literature on suicides does not support the > > >>>'method substitution theory' > > >>> > > >>> > > >>Then kindly explain gun-free Japan's higher rate of > > >>suicide. > > >> > > >> > > > > > >What happens in Japan is not an argument for method > > >substitution. You are trying to pretend that the underlying > > >causes of suicide are homogeneous and due to a single > > >variable. > > > > > > > The claim of the antis is that the presence of firearms causes > > suicides. > > The claim is that the presence of firearms significantly increases the > likelihood. These folks are placed where there are LESS guns availible to them. Their suicide rate is MUCH higher. http://www.nicic.org/pubs/1995/012475.pdf
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |