Re: The 2ed Amendment as a Gun Nuts Wet Dream

Scout wrote:
> 
> "Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > Roger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Buckaroo Banzai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Steve, you can try and warp the meaning of those twenty-seven words
> in
> > any
> > > > > manner you like, but their meaning is quite clear to any
> > clear-thinking
> > > > > person.  The Goverment *cannot* infringe on the individual's right
> to
> > keep
> > > > > and bear arms.
> > > >
> > > > As long as they are part of a well regulated militia, you are right.
> > > > Otherwise, it can, has, and continues to "infringe" on individuals
> right
> > to
> > > > keep and bear arms.
> > > >
> > > > Look at the court cases. You're wrong.
> > >
> > > Wrong.  The federal government has no constitutional authority to
> > > infringe on the private ownership of weapons.   The only arms the
> > > federal government has any constitutional authority over or
> > > government owned arms and militia in federal service.  The
> > > Constitution gives the federal government no authority or what
> > > weapons you may keep for your personal and family defense.
> >
> > You're wrong and you know you're wrong. There is gun control. It has not
> > been overturned in the courts. Therefore, the government can and does
> > control guns.
> >
> > Simple.
> 
> Thus anything the government does, and gets away with, no matter how
> tyrannical, oppressive and/or Unconstitutional is just fine by you?

Tyrants often support tyrants.



-- 
""Sic Semper Tyrannis" - Thus Always with Tyrants - John Wilkes Booth"

"Per ardua nec flectitur nec mutat. Confido, 
est voluntas dei, invictus maneo. Addere leci justitiam 
deo certavi et vici." - Rev. Shawn Cole, Cole Firearms Inc.