
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"The Lone Weasel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Mike Haas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > "The Lone Weasel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > > message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> BTW, Reuters says the NRA supported this appeal: > > http://news.findlaw.com/politics/s/20031201/courtgunsdc.htm > >> l > > >> Is that right, Mike? > > > > Both you and Reuters have to pay closer attention, and > > Reuters should DEFINITELY know better. > > > > NRA filed an Amicus Brief in support of Silveira, but only > > after it looked like it had a chance of winning cert. > > That's because NRA *has* to be involved in any Second > > Amendment case that gets to the USSC - it is their > > responsibility to it's members to help insure EVERY 2A USSC > > case the best chance of winning, IF IT GOT THERE. That is > > not to say NRA wanted the case to get there. > ...[Lee's silly spin SNIPPED - not even GOOD spin, disappointed in you Lee]... Ultimately, traveling too fast, he completely disintegrates... > The NRA is run by dumbasses who file amicus briefs for cases > they hope fail, and you're a big liar... > > Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh. Thanks, Lee! I hope t.p.g. notices that I reduced you to name-calling and childishness in ONE reply! (Ok, I admit. It isn't really that much of an accomplishment. Many others have done it before.) Mike Haas
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |