
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL
- __From__: Little John
- __Subject__: Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 05:59:52 -0600
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:28:39 GMT, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity, once
again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard, Angkor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]/32.553> two-fingered to all:
|>>|>>|>But it does. According to the OED.
|>>|>>
|>>|>>Oh, "mot" exists. However, not in the fashion used above. Using an
existing
|>>|>>word improperly is using a word that does not exist.
|>>|>
|>>|>Oh look! It's another spelling flame - how speshul!
|>>
|>>It wasn't a spelling flame, numbnuts. It's a grammar flame.
|>
|>How speshul.
How tippeekul of ewe.
jammin1-at-jammin1-dot-com
jammin1's Resources
www.jammin1.com
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL, (continued)
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Chris Morton
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Chris Morton
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
frog
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Morton Davis
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
I hate Keane
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
I hate Keane
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Chris Morton
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Chris Morton
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Morton Davis
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
I hate Keane
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Little John
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Asmodeus
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Dad
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
Little John
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
codemaan
- Re: 40 REASONS TO SUPPORT GUN CONTROL,
J. Hall