
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:45:21 -0800, "Allan Lindsay-O'Neal"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"John A. Stovall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> And just what's the perfect case, Mikey? Where do you draw the line
>> and go with what you've got.
>
>A lady school teacher living in a rough part of town who keeps a revolver in
>her glove compartment and gets arrested for violating a state "gun law."
>
>Not this mess brought about by a rugby team captain fond of posing with his
>skinned head and rifles for the press.
>
So the basic right doesn't matter but we must pick an acceptable
person's right to defend?
Funny idea you have when it come to defending basic rights.
In fact the viler the person the more important their basic rights be
defended.
*********************************************************
"...I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility
against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."
Thomas Jefferson in letters to
Madison (1787) and Rush (1800)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |