
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"David Hartung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Trevor Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "David Hartung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > "Trevor Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > **Even a cursory rad, shows that their facts about Australia are > > > incorrect. > > > > For instance, they claim that the gun buyback cost AUS$500 million > > > Dollars. > > > > The real cost was somewhat less than AUS$300 million. Clearly, such a > > > basic > > > > error throws the rest of their 'data' into disrepute > > > > > > You say that the cost of the Australian buy back was AUS$300 million, > > Fraser > > > says it was AUS$500 million. I assume that a research institute has more > > > extensive access to such information, than you do. Where do you get your > > > information and how completel is it? > > > > ** http://www.ssaa.org.au/iladec97.html > > > > Scroll down the page. You'll find the figures. > > Thanks, but just scanning the article seems to indicate that they are > essentially in agreement with the Canadian study. **AUS$500 million vs. AUS$300 million, is not agreement. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |