Re: Silveira DENIED Certiorari

"Sam Kersh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:19:34 GMT, Pat Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Sam Kersh wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:06:31 -0800, "Mike Haas"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>The United States Supreme Court announced this morning that it has
DENIED
> >>>the Silveira vs. Lockyer Petition for Certiorari. The Supreme Court
will not
> >>>hear the case.
> >>>
> >>>We should all be thankful for this.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This is one of the few times I think I'm in agreement with the Rabbit.
> >> Sam A. Kersh
> >
> > You're in bad company, Sam.  Haas is a pro gun control mole.  Silveira
was an
> >excellent case.
>
> I hate it that I might be in the same world with Haas, much less on
> the same page WRT Silvera.  But, IIRC, Jim Nicholson and Clayton
> Cramer,   two people I respect, are not behind this case.  Mouse isn't
> on track WRT Silvera - if the SCOTUS has to consider the 9th's
> opinion, they also have to consider the 5th's opinion support the
> individual right view in Emerson.  For the SCOTUS to grant cert, there
> needs to be more diverging opinions than these two.  And as the Court
> itself will tell anyone who asks, failure to grant certori doesn't
> mean a damn thing one way or the other....
>

EXACTLY.

-*MORT*-