Re: The 2ed Amendment as a Gun Nuts Wet Dream

Roger wrote:
> "David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Roger wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > > Look at the court cases. You're wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Wrong.  The federal government has no constitutional authority to
> > > > infringe on the private ownership of weapons.   The only arms the
> > > > federal government has any constitutional authority over or
> > > > government owned arms and militia in federal service.  The
> > > > Constitution gives the federal government no authority or what
> > > > weapons you may keep for your personal and family defense.
> > >
> > > You're wrong and you know you're wrong. There is gun control. It has not
> > > been overturned in the courts. Therefore, the government can and does
> > > control guns.
> > >
> > > Simple.
> >
> > If the above author feels the federal government has the
> > constitutional authority infringe on the private ownership of
> > weapons, let him state that portion of the Constitution which
> > gives that power to the federal government.
>
>
> You're wrong and you know you're wrong. There is gun control. It has not
> been overturned in the courts. Therefore, the government can and does
> control guns.


That kind of government arrogance argument is how one notable revolutionary 
war got started.

> > Good luck.
> >
> > David