Re: The 2ed Amendment as a Gun Nuts Wet Dream

"Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > Roger wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > It seems almost unfair to pick on the historically challenged.
> > >
> > > There is no individual right to keep and bear arms. Look at the court
> > > decisions. Look at the law. If there was such a right, the gun control
> laws
> > > on the books would have been overturned. They have not.
> >
> > The right to keep and bear arms existed, and was utilized, on
> > April `9, 1775.  It was reaffirmed the next year in the
> > Declaration of Independence.   If you deny the right to keep and
> > bear arms, I such you swear your allegiance to your Queen.
>
> There is no individual right to keep and bear arms. Look at the court
> decisions. Look at the law.

Speaking of the Law....

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Sorry, looks like there is an individual right to keep and bear arms, and
that right is protected by the law.